Collective agreements in Germany are legally binding, which is accepted by the public, and this is not a cause for concern. [2] [Failed verification] While in the United Kingdom there was (and probably still is) an “she and us” attitude in labour relations, the situation is very different in post-war Germany and in some other northern European countries. In Germany, the spirit of cooperation between the social partners is much greater. For more than 50 years, German workers have been represented by law on boards of directors. [3] Together, management and workers are considered “social partners.” [4] One consequence of this decline in trade union strength is a corresponding decrease in the ability of trade unions in a given sector or sector to set general pay and performance standards for a large percentage of workers in that sector or sector. When unions were stronger, they were able to align the structure of collective bargaining with the structure of companies in their sector and negotiate agreements with employers who set wage standards for an entire industry.6 EU agreements set wages for unionized workers and non-union employers raised wages to remain competitive. Unions have thus helped to increase the wages of all workers, both trade unions and trade unions. But the LNRA did not follow through on its objective. Over the past decades, the proportion of private sector workers linked to the object has steadily declined. Today, it accounts for just over 7% of the private sector workforce, less than one-third of what it was 40 years ago.4 The overall union membership rate is now lower than the first adoption of the NLRB.5 The long-standing idea of the NLRB is that a single unit is probably appropriate.15 This rule derives from the language of the NLRA. which describes potential bargaining units as “employers.” Unit, craft unit, factory unit or subdivision of this unit. 16 As a general rule, the only institution is a single job, although workers and trade unions can seek unity with several settlements, or even national unity, and try to convince the NLRB of the appropriateness of such a unit. The analysis examines whether work, personnel, supervision and labour relations in the various institutions are sufficiently linked to warrant unity with multiple annexes.17 The provisions of the NLRB bargaining units are rarely reversed. The NNRA should be amended to allow workers to designate a collective agreement unit with multiple employers or to consolidate several bargaining units in collective bargaining with multiple employers with one or more unions.
These negotiations can be either horizontal (within a sector) or vertical (for supply chain coverage).