The character of the notice also differs with respect to third parties. Therefore, effective communication must be forwarded to former clients who have dealt more directly with the Agency, while the notice by publication is sufficient for others. In addition, an agency may be terminated by legal protection. The death of the client acts as an immediate and absolute revocation of the agent`s authority, unless the Agency is bound to an interest. Third parties who are not aware of the resignation can reasonably believe that an ex-agent still has the power. To protect third parties who rely on such reasonable authority, an officer`s obvious authority often persists after resignation. Thus, a former agent may hire him under his apparent authority, even though the Agency is complete. 7. Dissolution of a business: When a business, whether it is the dissolution of the client or the agent, ends. When an officer is tasked with a particular task or for a specific purpose, if the task is performed by the agent or if the specific objective is accomplished, the Agency is fine-tuned. The modern basis of assistant responsibility is sometimes called “deep bag” theory: the client (usually a company) has deeper pockets than the agent, which means that he can afford to pay for injuries that can be traced in one way or another on the events he has triggered. A multi-million euro work accident occurred in the context of a company or its insurer; In general, not within the means of the agent – the employee – who caused them.
If the agent acted within the scope of the power actually conferred, the awarding entity must compensate the agent for payments made during the relationship, whether the expenses were expressly authorized or only necessary to promote the activity of the awarding entity. Different ways to terminate an agency:- A client`s duties to their agent are provided for in sections 175 to 178. The main tasks are: an agent must not accept new obligations incompatible with the obligations owed to the client. An agent may represent the interests of more than one principle, which is contradictory or potentially contradictory, only after full disclosure and agreement of the awarding entity. An agent must not seize an opportunity from the client by taking it for himself or passing it on to third parties. If, in such a case, the instrument clearly and clearly states that an agency ends without action by the adjudicating entity or agent after the expiry of the period indicated in the instrument. When, after the expiry of the contract period, the parties continue their relationship as contracting and agent powers, the rebuttable presumption is established that their relationship is governed by the original contract and that the contract is extended for a similar period. For example, if the parties have entered into a one-year contract and continue to act under contractual terms after one year, the court will find that the parties did intend to keep the contract alive for an additional year.
Court decisions over the past forty years have evolved into another standard that ensures the predictability of the officer`s behaviour. Under this standard, an employer can be held liable for the performance of its employee, even if it is exclusively for its own purposes, as long as it was foreseeable that the agent could act as it did. It`s the risk zone test. The employer is in the area at risk for employment liability, when the employee is where she is supposed to be, more or less does what she is supposed to do, and the incident was born out of the pursuit of the employer`s interests (again more or less).